Match & merge with countersign
This capability is arriving. Match candidates arrive scored and explained, and no merge lands until a second person countersigns it: the same decision door that seals everything else on the platform.
Scored match candidates with the evidence for and against each pair.
Maker and checker are enforced: the person who proposes a merge can never be the one who approves it.
Every merge is sealed with its evidence, and every merge can be unwound.
Propose
Matching proposes candidate pairs with scores and conflicting attributes laid out.
Countersign
A steward reviews, a second steward countersigns, and the merge seals through the decision door.
“Can the matching engine merge records on its own?”
No. Proposals are candidates only. A merge needs two people, and the record of who decided is sealed.
“What happens to a bad merge?”
Unmerge restores the sources exactly, because they were never overwritten, and the history of both decisions stays on the graph.
Start with proof, not a promise.
There are three ways in, and each one earns the next. You approve the exit criteria before we spend any more of your time or budget.
A 60-minute working session
Bring one report that is expensive to prove. We walk the mechanism against it. Nothing is required from your side.
A two-week guided sandbox
Your team works hands-on against a synthetic sample bank. It requires zero access to your systems and zero procurement.
A six-week proof on your systems
We use read-only metadata across five systems and one priority report, scored against criteria both sides sign first. The decision it produces is yours.