Golden records & survivorship
This capability is arriving. The design is public now so you can judge it before the release: one golden record per entity, assembled attribute by attribute under survivorship rules you can read, with the source of every surviving value on display and nothing overwritten.
One golden record per counterparty, instrument, or account, with the winning source named for every attribute.
Survivorship rules are versioned policy objects, so you can say why a value won on any date.
Sources are never overwritten: the golden record is derived, and the inputs stay on the graph.
Derive
Survivorship rules assemble the golden record from the source records, attribute by attribute.
Seal
The derivation and its rule version are sealed, so the record can be defended and rebuilt.
“Does the golden record replace our source systems?”
No. Sources stay authoritative for their own data. The golden record is a derived view with a sealed derivation trail, and unmerging is always possible.
“When does this arrive?”
It is scheduled behind the core proof work. The design ships first so your stewards can pressure-test the rules before anything runs.
Start with proof, not a promise.
There are three ways in, and each one earns the next. You approve the exit criteria before we spend any more of your time or budget.
A 60-minute working session
Bring one report that is expensive to prove. We walk the mechanism against it. Nothing is required from your side.
A two-week guided sandbox
Your team works hands-on against a synthetic sample bank. It requires zero access to your systems and zero procurement.
A six-week proof on your systems
We use read-only metadata across five systems and one priority report, scored against criteria both sides sign first. The decision it produces is yours.