Model monitoring
A model that passed validation last year can still hurt you this quarter. Monitoring watches production behavior continuously, covering outputs, error rates, and guardrail hits, and keeps the full trail from first signal to closed issue. Trust is derived from live evidence, so a model that stops reporting loses standing automatically.
Production models and agents are watched continuously, covering output quality, error rates, and guardrail hits, with thresholds set by risk tier.
Trust is derived from live evidence with no manual override, and silence counts against a model because absence is failure.
Every signal, alert, decision, and fix sits on one trail, sealed on the hash-chained ledger.
Breaches open issues through one decision door. Agents propose the response, and a human decides.
Verified closure applies to every finding, so a breached threshold cannot be closed by hand without evidence that it was fixed.
The platform works on metadata only. Your rows never leave your systems, and the metadata it does hold is treated as sensitive and kept under your keys.
Ingest
Production signals arrive through connectors. The platform reads metadata only, and nothing is retained.
Score
Each model's trust score updates continuously from evidence, and a model that goes quiet drops.
Respond
Threshold breaches open issues. Agents propose actions, and a human decides through the one decision door.
Prove
The full trail from signal to closure is sealed and ready to hand to an examiner.
“How is this model behaving right now, and how do you know?”
Production behavior is watched continuously through connectors, covering output quality, error rates, and guardrail hits, and each model's trust score updates from that live evidence. If a model goes quiet, its standing drops automatically, because absence is treated as failure.
“When it misfired last quarter, who did what and when?”
Every signal, alert, decision, and fix sits on one trail, sealed on the hash-chained ledger. You open the trail and see the first signal, the issue it opened, the person who decided the response, and the evidence that closed it.
“What does your ongoing monitoring look like, and can you show me the trail?”
Yes. Monitoring runs continuously with thresholds set by risk tier, breaches open issues through one decision door, and closure requires evidence that the problem was fixed. The full trail from first signal to verified closure is sealed and ready to hand to an examiner.
Start with proof, not a promise.
There are three ways in, and each one earns the next. You approve the exit criteria before we spend any more of your time or budget.
A 60-minute working session
Bring one report that is expensive to prove. We walk the mechanism against it. Nothing is required from your side.
A two-week guided sandbox
Your team works hands-on against a synthetic sample bank. It requires zero access to your systems and zero procurement.
A six-week proof on your systems
We use read-only metadata across five systems and one priority report, scored against criteria both sides sign first. The decision it produces is yours.